At the risk of stating the obvious, most
companies – across all industries – have followed a common priority since
2008: find a way to survive the
recessionary markets that have ensued from the financial crisis. For most, this has led to a sustained period
of cost-cutting, constrained investments, reduced capacities, and general
contraction mentality.
Anything that appeared to be discretionary, or
speculative, or prospective … these were the assets that were jettisoned in
favor of a leaner operating cadence. In
my mind, these lost assets are the necessary ingredients for growth, and they
have been mortgaged in favor of the imperative of weathering the storm.
Now, I am no economist and don’t pretend to
offer informed perspectives on causes and effects of recessionary markets, but
a few impacts are evident to me as I meet with executives about their agenda
for 2014.
To frame their mindset, it’s important to note
that US average annual GDP growth (including the Great Recession and an
estimate for 2013) has been just 0.9% compared to 2.4% in the years before 2007
and way below the average real growth of the 1980s and 1990s.
Across the major economies, the hope is that
central bank policy will convince corporations that interest rates will stay
low and so they can be confident of investing more. Most pundits
attribute central bank interest rate cuts, asset purchases (quantitative
easing) and ‘guidance’ for boosting stock markets up to today’s record
heights.
Yet, these actions have had little effect in
getting banks in most countries to start lending to corporations or for those
corporations to borrow to invest. Banks have still a lot of toxic assets from
the credit boom on their books and prefer to improve their balance sheets
rather than lend. And, large corporations flush with cash don’t need to borrow
to invest.
Bolstered, in part, by the exceptional
performance of equity markets I sense that optimism is returning and companies
are willing to place a few strategic bets on new sources of revenue and profit
expansion.
Goldman Sachs is also showing optimism about an investment boom in
2014. “The growth rate of nonresidential fixed investment (also known
as capital spending) has slowed from a cycle peak of around 10% in late
2011/early 2012 to just 3% in 2013, and we expect a reacceleration to about 8%
over the next year.”
But, investment depends on the level and
growth in business profits and profits ultimately depend on the profitability
of the existing stock of capital. Yet, companies are cautious about
ramping up the spend on capital assets, thus burdening their balance sheets at
a time when great energy was spent to diminish the intensity of capital
employment.
So … what does all of this mean to the outsourcing
and shared services industry? I sense an
accelerating appetite for “As A Service” offerings as a strategy to avoid
capital expense. Companies are looking
to fund their growth through their P&L statements, rather than their
balance sheets. This means that they
will contract for capacity with a variable provisioning model – pay-as-you-go –
as opposed to making a fixed cost commitment.
Driving to a higher Return on Invested Capital
is a top priority for most companies, and “As A Service” market offerings will
be a key strategy in 2014. Growth,
enabled by a business model that is flexible, agile, and variable.
Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment