Perhaps You
Haven’t Yet Escaped Y2K...
You probably have the same
desire in business.
Serving in various leadership
roles, I commonly found myself wishing for the option to build new services
from scratch, rather than wrestle with legacy encumbrances.
In 1999, I was appointed
CEO of one of the world's foremost Y2K consultancies. The entire company was
engineered around solving one particular problem, the millennial date change.
I leapt into the role with
the belief that there were assets in that company - smart people, trusted
client relationships, detailed knowledge of corporate applications and insight
into complex operating environments - that would one day allow us to develop a
new set of marketable services.
Sure, there might be a dip
in the financial performance of the company as we re-tooled for the future ...
that would be expected. Having come from a world of running complex global
operations, I knew that there would be great demand for accomplished
practitioners in combing the hairball of systems that most companies use to run
their business.
Surely a Y2K consultancy
could be relevant after the passing of that one event. Right? Those assets were
to be leveraged, weren't they?
We didn’t count on the
dot.com burst. Those weren't the best years to reinvent a small
publicly-listed, one-trick pony. We ended up selling the firm.
Across many industries
today, I sense a similar ambition for reinvention. They look to their current
assets - organizations, talent, products, clients, etc. - with the hope that
those can be refreshed for relevance in new economic conditions.
Almost every executive
enjoys the intellectual exercise of a "greenfield" design. What would
you do if you were starting your company today? Increasingly, this way of
thinking is fueled by nimble competitors and even activist investors. If someone
else can build a better mousetrap without the burden of existing people,
processes, and business constraints, shouldn't you be able to take those same
actions?
This notion reads much
easier than it lives. It’s a tough ask to be able to see through the
obstructions of present-day business burdens to reimagine a business that truly
leverages assets in a new model. It takes hard scrutiny to recognize which of
your current assets are truly valuable for the future versus being a drag on
your ability to change. Blockbuster probably thought their retail footprint was
an asset.
In 2000-2001, many
industries rebooted. Companies failed. Others merged. Fortunes were lost.
Unbridled optimism for bright and shiny new business models overtook common
sense. Neither the hare nor the tortoise survived.
There's a real art in
designing for the future when so much disruption and change is occurring all
around us. Almost feels like a millennial date problem, doesn't it?
Peter Allen has many years of operating experience as a top
executive of rapidly-growing multi-billion dollar companies and in assessing
sales and marketing effectiveness. He is now a Boston-based Managing Director
at Alvarez
& Marsal.
Image: Mil/Flick
No comments:
Post a Comment